EST. 2026

The Archive

Mass Communication · REF. TA-16421

News Framing Practices and Public Perception of Government Policies: A Comparative Analysis in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja

Abstract

This study investigates the subject matter outlined in the title above through a structured research design appropriate to its academic level. Using primary and/or secondary data collection methods, the research examines the underlying variables, tests relevant hypotheses, and presents findings with implications for practice and policy. This is placeholder abstract text generated for catalogue preview purposes; the full document contains a complete, topic-specific abstract, literature review, methodology, data analysis, and conclusion.

Chapter One — 1.1 Background to the Study

In recent years, News Framing Practices has emerged as a critical factor shaping public perception of government policies across organizations operating in and around the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. As institutions grapple with the pressures of globalization, regulatory reform, and shifting stakeholder expectations, understanding how news framing practices relates to public perception of government policies has become an important area of both scholarly and practical concern.

Within the context of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, this relationship carries particular significance. Organizations in this setting operate under a distinct combination of economic, regulatory, and market conditions that may amplify or dampen the effect of news framing practices on public perception of government policies, making a context-specific inquiry both timely and necessary.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

While news framing practices is widely discussed in policy and industry circles, empirical evidence on its actual effect on public perception of government policies within the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja remains sparse and, in places, contradictory. This lack of localized, rigorous evidence makes it difficult for decision-makers to know with confidence whether current approaches to news framing practices are helping or hindering public perception of government policies — a gap this study sets out to close.

1.3 Objectives of the Study

  1. To examine the effect of News Framing Practices on public perception of government policies in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.
  2. To assess the extent to which news framing practices influences public perception of government policies within the study area.
  3. To identify the challenges associated with news framing practices in relation to public perception of government policies.
  4. To recommend strategies for optimizing news framing practices in order to improve public perception of government policies.

1.4 Research Questions

  1. What is the effect of news framing practices on public perception of government policies in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja?
  2. To what extent does news framing practices influence public perception of government policies within the study area?
  3. What challenges are associated with news framing practices in relation to public perception of government policies?
  4. What strategies can be adopted to optimize news framing practices in order to improve public perception of government policies?

1.5 Significance of the Study

This study is significant to a range of stakeholders. For policymakers and regulators, the findings offer evidence to guide the design of frameworks that support healthier outcomes around public perception of government policies. For managers and practitioners within the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, the study provides practical insight into how news framing practices can be better managed. Finally, it contributes to the academic literature on mass communication by extending existing knowledge into a specific empirical context, and offers a reference point for future researchers.

1.6 Scope of the Study

The study is limited to an examination of News Framing Practices and its relationship with public perception of government policies within the context of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. It reflects a clearly defined scope of analysis and relies on data and perspectives available within that scope; generalizing the findings beyond this specific context should therefore be done with appropriate caution.

Chapters Two through Five, references and appendices are available for a one-time fee of ₦75,000.

Unlock Full Document