Chapter One — 1.1 Background to the Study

Scholarly interest in Buchi Emecheta's Purple Hibiscus has remained strong, reflecting its continued relevance to discussions of Nigerian and African literary identity.

Despite the volume of criticism devoted to Purple Hibiscus, its use of irony in relation to political disillusionment has not been exhaustively examined, leaving room for closer textual analysis.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

While Buchi Emecheta's Purple Hibiscus is widely studied, there is no settled critical consensus on how its irony functions specifically in relation to political disillusionment. This study undertakes a close textual analysis to address that gap.

1.3 Objectives of the Study

1. To examine the use of irony in Buchi Emecheta's Purple Hibiscus.
2. To analyze how irony contributes to the portrayal of political disillusionment.
3. To assess the effectiveness of irony as a stylistic/thematic tool in the text.
4. To situate the findings within the broader context of Nigerian literary/linguistic scholarship.

1.4 Research Questions

1. How is irony used in Buchi Emecheta's Purple Hibiscus?
2. In what ways does irony contribute to the portrayal of political disillusionment?
3. How effective is irony as a stylistic/thematic tool in the text?
4. How does this reading relate to the broader body of Nigerian literary/linguistic scholarship?

1.5 Significance of the Study

This study is significant to students and teachers of english language / literary studies, offering a close reading of Buchi Emecheta's Purple Hibiscus that can support classroom discussion and further critical work. It also contributes to the broader body of scholarship on Nigerian literary and linguistic studies.

1.6 Scope of the Study

The study is limited to a close textual analysis of irony within Purple Hibiscus, reflecting a PhD-level scope; it does not extend to a full survey of the author's other works.