Chapter One — 1.1 Background to the Study

Historians have long debated the significance of military rule in Northern Nigeria, though interpretations of its long-term consequences continue to evolve.

The years 1966-1999 represent a formative period for understanding military rule in Northern Nigeria, one that continues to inform present-day scholarship.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

Despite considerable historical scholarship, the precise role of military rule in Northern Nigeria during 1966-1999 remains a subject of ongoing debate, with existing accounts often relying on incomplete or contested source material. This study re-examines the available historical record to offer a clearer account.

1.3 Objectives of the Study

1. To trace the role of military rule in Northern Nigeria during 1966-1999.
2. To examine the factors that shaped military rule during this period.
3. To assess the consequences of military rule for Northern Nigeria.
4. To situate these findings within the broader historiography of the period.

1.4 Research Questions

1. What role did military rule play in Northern Nigeria during 1966-1999?
2. What factors shaped military rule during this period?
3. What were the consequences of military rule for Northern Nigeria?
4. How do these findings relate to the broader historiography of the period?

1.5 Significance of the Study

This study is significant to historians and students of history and international studies, contributing a focused account of military rule in Northern Nigeria to the existing historiography, and offering a reference point for future comparative or regional studies.

1.6 Scope of the Study

The study is limited chronologically to 1966-1999 and geographically to Northern Nigeria, reflecting a clearly defined scope; developments outside this period and region fall outside its remit.