Chapter One — 1.1 Background to the Study

Historians have long debated the significance of chieftaincy disputes in Northern Nigeria, though interpretations of its long-term consequences continue to evolve.

Within the period 1960-2015, chieftaincy disputes took on particular significance in Northern Nigeria, reflecting the wider political and economic pressures of the time.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

Despite considerable historical scholarship, the precise role of chieftaincy disputes in Northern Nigeria during 1960-2015 remains a subject of ongoing debate, with existing accounts often relying on incomplete or contested source material. This study re-examines the available historical record to offer a clearer account.

1.3 Objectives of the Study

1. To trace the role of chieftaincy disputes in Northern Nigeria during 1960-2015.
2. To examine the factors that shaped chieftaincy disputes during this period.
3. To assess the consequences of chieftaincy disputes for Northern Nigeria.
4. To situate these findings within the broader historiography of the period.

1.4 Research Questions

1. What role did chieftaincy disputes play in Northern Nigeria during 1960-2015?
2. What factors shaped chieftaincy disputes during this period?
3. What were the consequences of chieftaincy disputes for Northern Nigeria?
4. How do these findings relate to the broader historiography of the period?

1.5 Significance of the Study

This study is significant to historians and students of history and international studies, contributing a focused account of chieftaincy disputes in Northern Nigeria to the existing historiography, and offering a reference point for future comparative or regional studies.

1.6 Scope of the Study

The study is limited chronologically to 1960-2015 and geographically to Northern Nigeria, reflecting a clearly defined scope; developments outside this period and region fall outside its remit.