Chapter One — 1.1 Background to the Study

Over the past decade, the relationship between mentorship programs and venture performance of small and medium enterprises (smes) has become a subject of considerable debate among scholars and industry practitioners alike, particularly within the context of Kano State where operating conditions differ markedly from more developed markets.

Kano State presents a useful setting for examining this relationship precisely because the conditions there — structural, regulatory, and behavioural — differ from those typically assumed in the broader literature, most of which draws on evidence from more developed economies.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

While mentorship programs is widely discussed in policy and industry circles, empirical evidence on its actual effect on venture performance of small and medium enterprises (smes) within Kano State remains sparse and, in places, contradictory. This lack of localized, rigorous evidence makes it difficult for decision-makers to know with confidence whether current approaches to mentorship programs are helping or hindering venture performance of small and medium enterprises (smes) — a gap this study sets out to close.

1.3 Objectives of the Study

1. To examine the effect of Mentorship Programs on venture performance of small and medium enterprises (smes) in Kano State.
2. To assess the extent to which mentorship programs influences venture performance of small and medium enterprises (smes) within the study area.
3. To identify the challenges associated with mentorship programs in relation to venture performance of small and medium enterprises (smes).
4. To recommend strategies for optimizing mentorship programs in order to improve venture performance of small and medium enterprises (smes).

1.4 Research Questions

1. What is the effect of mentorship programs on venture performance of small and medium enterprises (smes) in Kano State?
2. To what extent does mentorship programs influence venture performance of small and medium enterprises (smes) within the study area?
3. What challenges are associated with mentorship programs in relation to venture performance of small and medium enterprises (smes)?
4. What strategies can be adopted to optimize mentorship programs in order to improve venture performance of small and medium enterprises (smes)?

1.5 Significance of the Study

This study is significant to a range of stakeholders. For policymakers and regulators, the findings offer evidence to guide the design of frameworks that support healthier outcomes around venture performance of small and medium enterprises (smes). For managers and practitioners within Kano State, the study provides practical insight into how mentorship programs can be better managed. Finally, it contributes to the academic literature on entrepreneurship by extending existing knowledge into a specific empirical context, and offers a reference point for future researchers.

1.6 Scope of the Study

In terms of scope, this BSc study confines itself to Kano State, focusing specifically on how mentorship programs relates to venture performance of small and medium enterprises (smes) within that setting. Findings are interpreted within these boundaries rather than as universal claims applicable to every organization or market.